Pressure without foundations
AI features already promised to the business, on an architecture and a data layer nobody has checked.
Services
Readiness, architecture, and delivery for enterprise AI: the foundations proven before the build, the use cases chosen on evidence, and the first ones running inside the systems you already operate.
Start a conversationMid-market and growth-stage teams under real pressure to ship AI, without a cohesive architecture, connected data, or governance to ship it on.
AI features already promised to the business, on an architecture and a data layer nobody has checked.
Fragmented tools, legacy infrastructure, and data siloed in the places it was first written.
Investment decisions being made without the in-house experience to say whether the roadmap holds.
A structured readiness assessment, and the implementation support to act on what it finds — one team across data, architecture, and delivery.
A structured review of architecture, data maturity, and governance, scored so you know where you actually stand before committing budget.
Pipelines consolidated, sources centralized, and the security and access model settled before a model is pointed at any of it.
The target architecture drawn, integration points named, and a path to it from the systems running today.
Azure, Microsoft 365, OpenAI, and Claude capabilities matched to the work in front of you, so you buy what you will actually use.
Candidate use cases scored on value and feasibility, then ordered into a backlog your engineers can pick up.
PromptVault governs what the AI is allowed to see once it is live; RepoAudit keeps the code it writes under review. The foundation and the guardrails go in together.
Three phases, each leaving you something you keep.
Architecture, data maturity, and governance assessed against the AI work you actually want to do.
A sequenced roadmap, plus the short list of high-leverage fixes worth doing immediately.
Quick wins deployed and a base your team can keep building on without us.
Proven patterns for getting data in and scaling it, already run in environments like yours.
Published configurations adapted to your estate rather than drawn from a blank page.
The assessment instrument itself: scoring model, evidence checklist, and the scorecard you keep.
The measures we agree on at the start, and report against at the end.
A validated AI readiness score
A technical backlog aligned to real use cases
Data pipelines that are reliable and observable
Stakeholders clear on the next AI feature
“They’ve helped us move at our own pace, which has benefited us.”
No. Data readiness is part of the assessment, and the pipeline, centralization and access work is part of the delivery that follows.
Yes. The readiness assessment stands on its own, and the score, the gaps and the roadmap are yours either way.
Start with a readiness assessment and leave with a score, a roadmap, and the fixes worth doing first.